Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 22.06.2025 00:53

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
New model helps to figure out which distant planets may host life - Phys.org
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
What nonsense did you hear today in India that made you laugh?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Citadel's Esposito says US deficit is a 'ticking time bomb' - Yahoo Finance
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Has anyone been spanked by their parents after becoming an adult?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
'Strawberry Moon' 2025: June's full moon is about to break an annual record - Live Science
Thank you.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russell's F1 Canadian GP win in doubt after Red Bull protest - Autosport